Sunday, January 15, 2012

Philippine mainstream media says yellow cliff island belongs to Chinese territory beyond question

Philippine mainstream media " Manila standard signs up for now " published signed article recently " It Belongs To China " , point out yellow cliff island from ancient belong to Chinese territory up to now, historical data is card, beyond question.



Article author dimension overcomes Tuo Ajisi (Victor N. Arches II) comes from Philippine celestial being model city, ever was an investment the home, register accountant and economist, history of be familiar with and politics.



The author goes out in article middle finger, yellow cliff island belongs to China 12 volt adaptor car really, be in early yuan of face 1279, china has discovered yellow cliff island and delimit its map. Chinese fisherman, no matter come from the mainland, still be Taiwan, fish in maritime space of yellow cliff island all the time. Actually, guo Shoujing (yuan toward Hu Bilie the Chinese astronomer of regnant pe 15 pin vga best buy riod, engineer holds mathematician concurrently) with respect to Ceng Duina Haitian area undertook mapping, and the yellow cliff island that mapping is nodded even if regards the Zhongsha Islands as one part.



dog crates large

Under photograph comparing, what Philippine Ministry of Foreign Affairs depends on " old " map, beguiling sex earthquake sounds says to have same sea area, however scale 1820, later than China 541 years. So the author shows, very open-eyed Philippine senatorial Edgardo Angara(is returned according to saying is well-known lawyer) actually can hall and the ground of emperor alleges one later than China map of 541 years, can explain Philippine in Huang Yan the island has priority more on attributive problem or conviction.



And, but let more astonishing is, joaquin Bernas Abba (Philippine 1987 of constitution basically draft one of people) , on a newspaper April 22, with the foundation that treaty of U.N. ocean law regarded him as to defend for Philippine territory 1982. But admit again after t satin pjs best buy he article " Parisian treaty stipulates Philippine territory does not include Huang Yan islan 12 volt adaptor laptop d " . How contrary view is this?



The article is written, so independence declared from American colonist hand 1946 when, what does Philippine territory have after all? Why 1899, 1935, 1943, 1973, 1986 with all previous constitution 1987 in, philippine did not allege does to Huang Yan the island have dominion? After all from where, begin from who, did we get these islands suddenly? How out of thin air?



resealable bags

The article points out, last centuries seventies later period, china reachs his in yellow cliff island the area around organized science for many times to make an on-the-spot investigation. 1980, china is in south reef establishs next monument, make number: Nanhai science makes an on-the-spot investigation. And 1997, this mark is falling without permission condition, by Philippine cleared 12 volt adaptor price .



The article says, till last centuries 90 time, the map that all Philippine governments issue did not delimit yellow cliff island it is in domanial limits. 1961, the 3046th law prevented the republic that parliamentary approval passes phenanthrene just undertakes to afore-mentioned islands sound alls alone. However, after 48 years on March 10, 2009, phenanthrene just revised a law blindly, one-sided ground announces to have dominion to these controversy islands.



The writings shows, an undeniable fact is, 3 international treaty supports China to have dominion to those is most popular selling 12 volt adaptor lands. They are respectively: " beautiful 1898 on the west Parisian treaty satin pjs for woman " , " Ximeihua filled a treaty 1900 " , " 1930 flower beauty treaty " , they are in Philippine do 15 pin vga cable manial and attrib border demarcate the east longitude 118 degrees of lines.



The author says finally, the basis that Philippine sound alls alo 15 pin vga to hdmi ne was 1982 merely treaty of U.N. ocean law. Be known with respect to me, mere " convention " cannot be overthrown or replace the pact that signs between colonist or reached agreement. Even, although it is become to do a virtuous really " law " , it also cannot date from become effective and and change fact. So, are we fooling who? (Yang Mu)

No comments:

Post a Comment